There is no one definitive answer to this question. Some factors to consider include the size and complexity of your organization’s DNS infrastructure, the amount of traffic your domain controllers are handling, the amount of redundancy your organization has in its DNS infrastructure, and the type of DNS services your organization uses.
Ultimately, the decision whether or not to point domain controllers to themselves for DNS depends on the specifics of your organization’s situation. Some considerations include the following:
How large and complex is your organization’s DNS infrastructure?
How much traffic does your domain controllers handle?
How redundant is your organization’s DNS infrastructure?
What type of DNS services does your organization use?
If your organization is relatively small and doesn’t have a lot of traffic or redundancy, then it may not be necessary to point domain controllers to themselves for DNS. If, on the other hand, your organization has a large DNS infrastructure and lots of traffic, then it may be prudent to point domain controllers to themselves for DNS in order to improve performance. If you have any questions about whether or not to point domain controllers to themselves for DNS, please don’t hesitate to reach out to your IT support team.
6 Related Question Answers Found
Domain Controllers should use themselves for DNS. There are several reasons why this is the best practice. First, it is a best practice to have a single point of administration for your DNS.
There has been much debate recently as to whether or not a Domain Controller (DC) should point itself to the DNS servers for the domain. This debate is based on the theory that if a DC is not authoritative for the domain, then users may not be able to access resources on the domain. However, there are also many other reasons why a DC might point itself to the DNS servers.
An elaborate article might include:
-The history of DNS and why it is important
-The different types of DNS servers
-The benefits of using a domain controller for DNS
-The potential disadvantages of using a domain controller for DNS
The history of DNS and why it is important
Domain name systems (DNS) are essential for the functioning of the Internet. DNS is a hierarchical system that maps names (such as www.google.com) to IP addresses. When you type the name www.com into your browser, your computer consults DNS to find the IP address for that site.
Domain controller DNS should point to itself in order to optimize DNS lookup performance. This is because the AD DS server is the authoritative source for the AD domain. If the AD DS server is not available, then DNS queries for the AD domain will be directed to the local DNS server.
There are pros and cons to having DNS servers on domain controllers. On the pro side, domain controllers are typically more reliable and faster than standalone DNS servers. They can also handle more requests simultaneously, which can result in faster DNS resolution times.
There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question, as the best answer for your organization depends on a variety of factors specific to your organization. However, in general, it is generally recommended that all domain controllers be DNS servers. This is because DNS is a critical part of the Domain Name System (DNS), and without DNS, users and computers would not be able to find domain names or other resources on the network.
